<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" 
   xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" 
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
   <title>Nick Martin on Bread</title>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org</link>
   <description>Because the internet needed another blog.</description>
   <language>en</language>
   <copyright>Copyright 2006 Nick Martin</copyright>
   <ttl>60</ttl>
   <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:09 GMT</pubDate>
   <managingEditor>spam-blog@nimlabs.org</managingEditor>
   <generator>PyBlosxom http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/ 1.3.2 2/13/2006</generator>
<item>
   <title>Almost Injera</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2007-06-04-00-09</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2007-06-04-00-09.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>This weekend I got much closer to decent injera than I ever have before.</p>

<p>The major difference was that I used baking powder in the
batter. Perhaps this is cheating, but at this point, I'm willing to make
some sacrifices. The injera still wasn't great, but it was at least
edible.</p>

<p>As to the other details, I used 50/50 ivory teff and AP wheat flour,
175% hydration, and I gelated 16oz of the batter with 24oz hot
water. The baking powder was mixed in just prior to cooking, although I
think next time I'll try self rising flour instead of AP.</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>After a long hiatus</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2007-04-30-22-36</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2007-04-30-22-36.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p> It has been a long time since I've made any bread. Too long. For a
dinner party this past Sunday, I started back into baking with a couple of
focaccia.</p>

<p>The main distinctive factor was that I went out and got a bunch of
fresh basil and oregano, steeped them in warm oil, and then used them to
top the focaccia. It came out pretty well, although perhaps slightly
undercooked.</p>

<p>I've also started a sourdough rye. More on that later.</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 05:36 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Another dutch oven bread</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2007-02-27-11-57</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2007-02-27-11-57.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>This post is rather late. Sorry.</p>

<p>On Sunday I made another attempt at dutch oven bread, this time an
unenriched loaf. I didn't have a lot of time, so I couldn't do pure
sourdough. But I did want some sourness, so I used some starter in
addition to poolish as a pre-ferment.
</p>

<p>I wasn't really working from a recipe or anything, so I just kinda
improvised. I ended up with about 400g each of poolish and sourdough
starter. To that I added about 600g of bread flour, some salt, some
instant yeast, and enough water to bring it to about 70% hydration.
</p>

<p>I let it rise in a plastic tub, then moved it to the dutch oven to
proof. After an hour of proofing, I placed the oven in a preheated
550&deg;F oven to bake with the lid on for 20 minutes. Then dropped the
temp to 450&deg; and uncovered for 20 more minutes.
</p>

<p>It turned out just fine. Not exceptional, but quite tasty (if
large. 12in is just too big for a loaf.)
</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Plain old white bread (in a dutch oven!)</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2007-02-24-22-40</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2007-02-24-22-40.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>OK, so not exactly plain.</p>

<p>It has been a while since I've written anything about bread. And since
I've baked bread, too! I wasn't up for a full sourdough cycle, so I
decided to try a quick experiment: simple, fast, direct dough white
bread, but baked in a dutch oven.
</p>

<p>It worked just fine. I got a 12in diameter, 2in tall disk of perfectly
tasty, and very fluffy, bread. I mean, it isn't award winning or
anything, but I didn't really expect much from 3 hours of fermentation.
</p>

<p>The dough was pretty standard enriched white bread, probably about what
you'd find in most bread-maker recipes. Perhaps a little wetter than
average, but not by much. The dutch oven was a cast iron 12in Lodge camp
oven (some of my readers probably know this oven well). I let the dough
proof in the dutch oven, then put them both in our kitchen oven,
preheated to 400&deg;F to bake. I baked 20min with the lid on for steam,
then uncovered for about 20 more minutes to generate top crust. That
seemed to work out decently, but of course the sides touching the iron
directly had a much crispier crust.
</p>

<p>The loaf came out of the oven perfectly, so there was minimal cleanup
required. I may be testing out the dutch oven baking technique more
throughly over the coming days. It certainly is easy.
</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 06:40 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Once more into the breach</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2006-11-30-04-24</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2006-11-30-04-24.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>I baked another batch of sourdough over the last few days. This time
only two loaves worth. I targeted 60% hydration, and it seems to be
about right. It was a little cold for the leavens, so I think the dough
may have had a bit too high an acid load, which made it slightly too
slack.
</p>

<p>I used the stand mixer for the first half of kneading, but did the second
half by hand. In the process of hand kneading I probably worked another
little bit of flour in, bringing the hyrdration down a bit more.
</p>

<p>Once again, I proofed in my ghetto bannetons. It seemed to go well. I
let them proof in the oven after a warm cycle (the dough was at
75&deg;F) for a grand total of 2.5 hours. The last half hour was out of
the oven, while it preheated.
</p>

<p>I put the stone and the bread on the second from top position, so that
it got radiant heat from the oven ceiling. The cast iron went on a lower
rack. I think next time I might put it on the oven floor again. It gets
much hotter there, although that does mean it throws off more fumes as
it heats up. Hopefully after a couple cycles of that without reseasoning
it will be done burning.
</p>

<p>The loaves did not get quite the loft I was hoping for, possibly from
the aforementioned high acid load. Still, they came out pretty
reasonably shaped.
</p>

<p>Neither the crust nor the crumb were perfect, but overall I'd give the
loaves high marks.
</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:24 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Dough way too loose</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2006-11-21-17-17</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2006-11-21-17-17.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>The dough was considerably too loose, causing problems all throughout
the process. First off, it didn't come cleanly out of the plastic
tub. This may be in part because I used less olive oil to lube up the
tub, but I suspect it would have been enough oil for a properly hydrated
dough.
</p>

<p>Second, it stuck to everything while I was shaping it, so I had to
handle it a bit less gently than I'd like. By the time I had it shaped
and in bannetons, I'm pretty sure it had lost all its gas.
</p>

<p>Interestingly, the dough rose to double its size entirely in the
fridge. I'm guessing this was in part due to the fact that I had a
fairly large mass of it in a single container, so it took a long time
for the center to cool. The fridge only about 41&deg;F, which is warmer
than I'd like, too.
</p>

<p>When turned out of the bannetons, the loaves instantly oozed to a
very flat shape.
</p>

<p>This time, I put the cast iron griddle on the floor of the oven
(where it got scorching hot and started to smoke), the stone on the
first rack near the bottom, and nothing on the top rack. When I put the
loaves in, two went on the stone, and two on a cool baking sheet on the
top rack. Half way through, when I rotated the loaves, I removed the
baking sheet from under the top two, putting them directly on the oven
rack (well, on parchment directly on the rack).
</p>

<p>As the loaves came out, the ones on the stone had a well done bottom
crust but a shitty top crust, and the ones on top had a well done top
crust but a shitty bottom crust. Perhaps next time I'll try just two
loaves, on the stone, with it in the top rack spot.
</p>

<p>Boy do I want a brick oven. I've got most of a plan worked out in my
head, but I need to formalize it on paper.
</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Another low(er) protein sourdough started</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2006-11-20-12-27</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2006-11-20-12-27.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>I've started another batch (two mixer loads worth) of sourdough. I'm
using two 100% leavens again, totaling about 1500g of leaven (600g for
each load, plus some to go back into storage).
</p>

<p>The dough has 300g of KA bread flour from the leaven and 500g of KA AP
flour, and is about 62% hydration. The last batch was 64% to start, but
I had to feed in a lot of flour at kneading time to get it to a sane
consistency. This time, the dough is still a little wet. I think the
lower protein content of the flour means less water is needed. Next time
I'll target about 60%.
</p>

<p>I'm still waiting for Whole Foods to get back to me on the 50lb bag of
Giusto's flour. Once that comes in, I'll probably just work solely with
it.
</p>

<p>I really like working with the metric system. It makes the math
<b>so</b> much easier. I have no idea why I didn't switch
sooner. Actually, I take that back, I do know why; I blame Peter
Reinhart.
</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Problems loading. Burnt bottoms.</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2006-11-16-19-58</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2006-11-16-19-58.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>Up until the turning out and loading, this round of sourdough had been
going quite well. I wanted to fit all 4 loaves into the oven at once,
since last time the two load approach resulted in over-proofing on the
second load. So I had this plan to load one loaf onto a sheet pan, and
the other three onto the pizza stone (which I checked before, would
<b>just</b> fit).
</p>

<p>This turned out to be a stupid idea. It was hard to implement and
resulted in the loaves sticking and stretching in various places during
the loading process, and was just generally a bad scene. I think the
loaves all ended up OK overall shape wise, but there is some noticeable
damage.
</p>

<p>The loaf that was on the sheet pan instead of the stone has a
completely black bottom. I knew that metal would conduct heat faster and
thus burn the loaf faster, but I didn't think it would be quite this
bad. I think I just need another pizza stone, and to use both racks in
the oven, instead of just putting cast iron mass on the second rack. Or,
a larger pizza stone that fills more of the rack.
</p>

<p>All that said, the bread actually turned out quite tasty. It had a
much chewier crumb than previous attempts, and a more open
structure. The crust on the burnt one was very good (other than the
burnt part, of course). The other crusts were OK, but not
stellar. Overall, probably an A- (but my standards are very high these
days).
</p>


]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 03:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Adventures in the metric system</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2006-11-15-21-11</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2006-11-15-21-11.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>I'm trying a totally new (well, ok, actually pretty similar overall)
technique this time. To start, I'm using the metric system. It really is
just better and easier to work with. I'm making two batches, each with a
total flour weight of 800g, of which 600g is KA AP and 200 is KA bread
flour.
</p>

<p>Which brings me to another difference in this batch: much less
protein. I've been reading a bunch of things which suggest I may be
using too high a protein flour for the type of bread I'm trying for. So,
yeah, less protein. We'll see how it goes.
</p>

<p>And the final difference is that I went for two leavens of 100%
sponge, instead of my normal one at 100% and one at 60% or so. Also,
this time the leaven is a little more of the total mass of the
dough. 200g of the 800g total come from the leaven.
</p>

<p>Also, I'm moving from keeping a 100% sponge in the fridge as a
storage sponge to about 60%. I think this will help it keep more yeast
alive for the periods I generally leave it.
</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
   <title>Someone else did (almost) exactly what I want to do</title>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">bread/2006-11-14-21-00</guid>
   <link>http://blog.nimlabs.org/bread/2006-11-14-21-00.html</link>
   <description><![CDATA[

<p>And wrote about it here: <a href="http://heatkit.com/html/bakeov11.htm">
http://heatkit.com/html/bakeov11.htm</a>
</p>

<p>Not identical to what I want, but pretty close.</p>

]]></description>
   <category domain="http://blog.nimlabs.org"></category>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

